SSM
  • Home
  • News
  • Team
    • Teela Crosthwaite Smith
    • Lindsey S. Mignano
    • Kelly Lawton-Abbott
    • Seth Pardee
    • Jessica Ryland
    • Jennifer Junkin
    • Eric A. Cox II
    • Philip Omorogbe
    • Shinjini Ray
    • Jason Galek
    • Makell Morrill
    • Tyler Collins
    • Dana Short
  • Deck
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • News
  • Team
    • Teela Crosthwaite Smith
    • Lindsey S. Mignano
    • Kelly Lawton-Abbott
    • Seth Pardee
    • Jessica Ryland
    • Jennifer Junkin
    • Eric A. Cox II
    • Philip Omorogbe
    • Shinjini Ray
    • Jason Galek
    • Makell Morrill
    • Tyler Collins
    • Dana Short
  • Deck
  • Blog
  • Contact
Search

blog

arbitration agreements: why arbitration might BE PREFERABLE TO LITIGATION, and how to enforce agreements to arbitrate

7/12/2016

 
Many businesses face the question of whether to include an arbitration provision in their contracts, but are unsure what arbitration is and/or what the financial ramifications of arbitration may be for their business.  

Simply put, arbitration is an out-of-court proceeding.  By way of an example, in the case of a service agreement, an arbitration clause mandates that the client referenced in the service agreement must arbitrate any legal claims related to the services provided under the service agreement, rather than taking those claims to court.  A third-party neutral, otherwise known as an arbitrator, analyzes the claims and decides the outcome of the arbitration, much like a judge would oversee and decide a case if the issues were tried in court.

Some arbitration clauses provide for binding arbitration, which means that the parties must abide by the arbitrator’s rules, and that courts will enforce the arbitrator’s decision.  On the other hand, sometimes arbitration clauses are non-binding, which means that if the parties do not like the arbitrator’s decision, they are free to reject it and pursue resolution of the dispute in court.  Business owners should consult with qualified business attorneys when drafting or negotiating their company’s arbitration clause or agreement to determine which of these options makes the most sense for them.

There are good reasons why a company may elect arbitration.  First, arbitration may be less costly than litigation.  Discovery can be limited, reducing legal bills and administrative costs.  Second, arbitration is more confidential; the business does not have to fear media backlash or reputational injury from having a lawsuit filed against it in a local state or federal court.  Third, depending on the clause or agreement, the parties can work together at the negotiation stage to select an arbitrator with the appropriate expertise for any disputes arising from the service agreement.  Parties do not have this sort of freedom in selecting judges.  Finally, it is usually quicker to resolve claims in arbitration since courts in California are often flooded with lawsuits, and scheduling hearings in court can take months at a time.

For the reasons outlined above, most companies decide to include an arbitration provision in their service contracts.  Mere inclusion of an arbitration clause, however, does not mean that a lawsuit will never be filed for services arising from the contract.  Simply including a provision for arbitration in a contract does not divest California courts of jurisdiction to hear the matter.  When a lawsuit is filed despite an agreement to arbitrate, a business may seek to enforce the arbitration clause or agreement via a motion to compel arbitration and stay judicial proceedings.  Conversely, when a lawsuit has not yet been filed, a business may seek to enforce the arbitration clause or agreement by way of a petition to compel arbitration.
 
For a good number of small businesses and emerging companies in California, the California Arbitration Act (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 1280-1294.2) dictates the procedure of moving to compel arbitration.  (Note: In cases where the contract involves maritime or interstate commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16, 201-208, 301- 307) may apply.)  
A business’ failure to move to compel arbitration is fatal to enforcement; it means that the company will have to defend against the lawsuit in court.  

In order to move to compel arbitration in California, a business must first plead:


  1. A written agreement to arbitrate between the moving party and the party refusing to arbitrate;
  2. A request or demand by one party to the other party or parties for arbitration of such controversy pursuant to and under the terms of their written arbitration agreement;  and
  3. The refusal of the other party or parties to arbitrate such controversy pursuant to and under the terms of their written arbitration agreement.

Luckily for businesses, arbitration is a favored remedy in California, and most courts lean towards enforcement of an arbitration clause or agreement.  However, there are some exceptions.  A court may find that the clause or agreement is unenforceable due to unconscionability, waiver, revocation, and/or another pending court action with possibility of conflicting rulings.  

With regard to
involuntary waiver in particular, a company may waive its right to enforce the arbitration clause based on:


  1. Taking actions inconsistent with intent to arbitrate;
  2. Case activity/procedural posture of the matter thus far;
  3. Undue or suspicious delay;
  4. Filing of a counterclaim without asking for a stay of the proceedings;
  5. Engaging in discovery not available under arbitration; and/or
  6. Prejudice to non-moving party.

The foregoing factors are not necessarily intuitive to non-lawyers, and courts have denied companies'  motions to compel arbitration on the basis that companies unknowingly, involuntarily waived their right to arbitrate.  Therefore, if your business gets into a dispute over an arbitration provision or agreement, it is imperative to seek advice of counsel right away in order to preserve your right to arbitrate the matter.  Counsel can effectively advise you what to do to ensure that your company does not waive its right to arbitrate under the agreement.  

Smith Shapourian & Mignano, LLP is available to answer any questions or concerns you may have regarding your business’ arbitration clause or agreement, as well as to help your business enforce an agreement to arbitrate.  Please contact us for a consultation.

This blog does not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice, and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. This blog should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney licensed or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. You should always consult a suitably qualified attorney regarding any specific legal problem or matter in a timely manner, as statutes of limitations may bar your claim.
Edwin Castro
2/26/2023 08:17:39 pm

"As much as I am shocked and ecstatic to have won the Powerball drawing, the real winner is the California public school system". No one would convince me that winning this lottery Powerball or mega millions is not something that changes the way and view of life's prospects. My name is Edwin Castro and I am from California, United States. I won the Powerball Lottery on Nov 7 2022 and I am coming to say a wonderful and big thanks to Dr Anokokudo for helping me with the winning numbers for the Powerball Lottery. I was really overwhelmed the day I contacted Dr Anokokudo to help me win the California Powerball Lottery when he instructed me what to do. The time came to play the lottery and I did and believe me, it was exhilarating. I won the Powerball $2.04 Billion and collected the lump sum of $997.6 Million and the November Powerball drawing raised a record $156.3 million for the California public school system. I am indeed thankful to Dr Anokokudo and others who helped me with his contact. Anyone who reads my comments should also try to contact Dr Anokokudo at [email protected]


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    February 2023
    October 2022
    September 2022
    September 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016

    Categories

    All
    83(b) Elections
    Arbitration
    Benefit Corporation
    Bootstrapping
    Business Name
    Buy-Sell Agreement
    Cannabis
    CBD
    Cloud
    Commercial Lease
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Coronavirus
    Crowdfunding
    Delaware Flip
    Dissolution
    Early Hires
    Employers
    Employment Law
    Entrepreneurs
    Entrepreneur Spotlight
    Financials
    Funding/Financing
    GDPR
    Guest Blogger
    Health Care
    HR
    Industrial Hemp
    Insurance
    IT Solutions
    Joint Ventures
    Litigation
    LLC
    LOEN
    Logo
    Marketing
    Non Profits
    Non-Profits
    Partnerships
    Patent
    Pitch Deck
    Privacy Policy
    Professional Corporation
    Raising Money
    S Corp
    Securities
    Settlement
    Small Business
    Sole Proprietorship
    Startups
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Trademarks
    Website

    RSS Feed


​© 2024 SSM Law PC.  All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy 
Terms of Use
Accessibility Statement

Attorney Advertising 
​Client Reviews & Testimonials

​

  • Home
  • News
  • Team
    • Teela Crosthwaite Smith
    • Lindsey S. Mignano
    • Kelly Lawton-Abbott
    • Seth Pardee
    • Jessica Ryland
    • Jennifer Junkin
    • Eric A. Cox II
    • Philip Omorogbe
    • Shinjini Ray
    • Jason Galek
    • Makell Morrill
    • Tyler Collins
    • Dana Short
  • Deck
  • Blog
  • Contact